Rating vs. paired comparison for the judgment of dominance on first impressions - Université Polytechnique des Hauts-de-France Access content directly
Journal Articles IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing Year : 2020

Rating vs. paired comparison for the judgment of dominance on first impressions

Abstract

This paper presents a contest between the rating and the paired comparison voting in judging the perceived dominance of virtual characters, the aim being to select the voting mode that is the most convenient for voters while staying reliable. The comparison consists of an experiment where human subjects vote on a set of virtual characters generated by randomly altering a set of physical attributes. The minimum number of participants has been determined via numerical simulation. The result of the experiment is a set of stereotypes for the perception of submissiveness or dominance. Results show that the two voting modes result in equivalently expressive models of dominance. Further analysis of the voting procedure shows that, despite an initial slower learning phase, after about 30 votes the judging speed matches between the two modes. Finally, a subjective questionnaire reports a higher (63.8%) preference for the paired comparison mode.
Not file

Dates and versions

hal-03400366 , version 1 (25-10-2021)

Identifiers

Cite

Fabrizio Nunnari, Alexis Heloir. Rating vs. paired comparison for the judgment of dominance on first impressions. IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing, 2020, pp.1-1. ⟨10.1109/TAFFC.2020.3022982⟩. ⟨hal-03400366⟩
9 View
0 Download

Altmetric

Share

Gmail Facebook Twitter LinkedIn More